|
design tips
Digital don't!
Why
using an inexpensive digital camera can cause problems
Digital cameras keep getting
better and cheaper. Just a few years ago, only professional studio
photographers could afford multi-mega pixel digital cameras. But now that 2
mega pixel cameras are hovering around $300, they have become affordable
for many consumers.
But this doesn't mean you
should use them for your next photo session. While price and quality have
gotten better, most digital cameras are not ready for high-resolution
print publishing—especially low-cost cameras.
The number one problem is lack
of resolution. Low-cost digital cameras are best for publishing images on
the Web at 72 dpi. High-resolution printing typically requires images to
have a resolution of 300 dpi. Poor image quality will result, which can
severely curb the quality of your design.
If you must use images from a
digital camera, use them small in your layout and use the highest quality
camera setting possible. Resolution and physical dimensions are in direct
proportion to each other. By reducing the size, the resolution goes
Clipping
paths
Say goodbye to backgrounds
and hello to good looking silhouettes by using clipping paths
When printing to a PostScript
device, a picture is always a rectangle. If that's true, you might be
wondering about all those round images and precisely outlined catalog
shots you have seen.
The way around the rectangle
restriction is to tell your printer to only print the part of the
rectangle inside a path. This path clips the rectangle to its shape, hence
the term clipping path.
One of the lesser-known tricks
when using clipping paths is that your output device has to read the whole
image before it can clip it to the path. Therefore, when you are creating
a clipping path, crop the image as close as possible to make a rectangle
around the area where you will be putting your clipping path. This will
speed up importing and printing the image.
There are several ways to
create clipping paths. You can draw them in Photoshop or in a page-layout
application. The preferred method is to draw them in Photoshop, because it
zooms in to precisely draw a complex path around hair or other tiny
details. However, if you need to rough out a clipping path to show a
client, it is quick and easy to do so in Quark or InDesign.
Here are some basic guidelines
when using clipping paths:
- Clipping paths are always
hard-edged, so they look awful if they cut off a shadow or other soft
edge.
- When you save a drawn path
in Photoshop as a clipping path, put the number three in the Flatness
setting. This will make the clipping path easier and faster to draw at
high resolution without affecting the output quality.
- Try to zoom in on your
pixels and cut your path through the middle of a pixel. This will
eliminate edge splash (when a little bit of adjacent color shows
through around the edges of your clipping path).
- If you are creating a
final-quality clipping path (as opposed to a comp), make sure to print
it out at as high resolution as possible and check it carefully for
edge splash or weird shapes. These are much easier to catch on a proof
than on screen.
Unsharp mask
Don’t
be afraid of this mask! In Photoshop, using Unsharp Mask is an important
step in image editing
When judging the
quality of a photograph, sharpness is a top consideration. If an image is not sharp, it is less lifelike.
Loss of sharpness is
inevitable in the production process. Every step diminishes image definition.
To handle blurry images, Photoshop offers a few sharpening filters
including Sharpen Edges and Sharpen More. But it is Unsharp Mask that
should be used in prepress production.
The Unsharp Mask filter
enhances the sharpness of an image by increasing the difference between
dark and light areas. The eye interprets the contrast as sharp edges. The settings
of the Unsharp Mask offer precise control and experimenting with them will
help you understand this powerful filter better.
|